This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revision | ||
| notes:physics:quantum-mechanics:harmonic-oscillator [2026/09/27 16:36] – [Trying to guess the operators] chris | notes:physics:quantum-mechanics:harmonic-oscillator [2026/09/30 19:21] (current) – [position and momentum operators] chris | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 43: | Line 43: | ||
| $$\psi'' | $$\psi'' | ||
| - | The *problem* with this approach when first learning about the quantum harmonic | + | The //problem// with this approach when first learning about the quantum harmonic |
| oscillator is that you kind have to already know before what type of result you | oscillator is that you kind have to already know before what type of result you | ||
| expect and what unit reconstruction to do, or blindly trust your textbook, ending | expect and what unit reconstruction to do, or blindly trust your textbook, ending | ||
| - | up in not understanding what you're doing (*that's what happened to me at least*). | + | up in not understanding what you're doing (//that's what happened to me at least//). |
| The second approach is starting by demanding the use of a dimensionless variable, and | The second approach is starting by demanding the use of a dimensionless variable, and | ||
| Line 345: | Line 345: | ||
| ==== Construction & Annihilation operators ==== | ==== Construction & Annihilation operators ==== | ||
| - | ==== Rewriting the hamiltonian | + | Ideally, we'd like to have these operators, $V^\dagger$ and $V$, in some type of normalized |
| + | form. We can achieve that by studying their commutator. | ||
| + | |||
| + | $$\begin{align*} | ||
| + | \left[V, | ||
| + | &= \left[\hat x+\frac{i\hat p}{m\omega}, | ||
| + | &= -\frac{i}{m\omega}\left[\hat x,\hat p\right] + \frac{i}{m\omega}\left[\hat p,\hat x\right] \\ | ||
| + | &= -\frac{i}{m\omega}\big(i\hbar-(-i\hbar)\big)\\ | ||
| + | &= \frac{2\hbar}{m\omega} \\ | ||
| + | \\ | ||
| + | & | ||
| + | \left[\sqrt{\frac{m\omega}{2\hbar}}V, | ||
| + | & | ||
| + | \left[\hat a, \hat a^\dagger\right] = 1 | ||
| + | \end{align*}$$ | ||
| + | |||
| + | $$$$ | ||
| + | |||
| + | These are what we call the **creation** and **annihilation** operators $\hat a^\dagger, \hat a$. | ||
| + | They are called this way because when they act on the Hamiltonian, | ||
| + | quanta of energy, one at a time, and thus raise or lower the energy state of the oscillator. | ||
| + | |||
| + | $$\boxed{\hat a^\dagger=\sqrt{\frac{m\omega}{2\hbar}}\left(\hat x-\frac{i}{m\omega}\hat p\right)}$$ | ||
| + | $$\boxed{\hat a=\sqrt{\frac{m\omega}{2\hbar}}\left(\hat x+\frac{i}{m\omega}\hat p\right)}$$ | ||
| + | $$\left[\hat a,\hat a^\dagger\right]=1$$ | ||
| + | $$\left[\hat a, | ||
| + | |||
| + | Obviously those operators are not hermitian. But their combination is, just like $V^\dagger$ and $V$, | ||
| + | since $\left(\hat a^\dagger\hat a\right)=\hat a^\dagger\left(\hat a^\dagger\right)^\dagger = \hat a^\dagger\hat a$. | ||
| + | This factorization was first used by Paul Dirac and isn't limited to just the quantum harmonic oscillator. | ||
| + | But their names are specific to the QHO, due to the quanta creation/ | ||
| + | they are called **ladder operators** as a pair, or **raising** and **lowering** operators when referring to | ||
| + | them individually. | ||
| + | |||
| + | It is also useful to solve the system above for the position and momentum operators. | ||
| + | |||
| + | $$\boxed{\hat x=\sqrt{\frac{\hbar}{2m\omega}}\left(\hat a^\dagger+\hat a\right)}$$ | ||
| + | $$\boxed{\hat p=i\sqrt{\frac{\hbar m\omega}{2}}\left(\hat a^\dagger-\hat a\right)}$$ | ||
| + | ==== Rewriting the Hamiltonian ==== | ||
| + | |||
| + | We can now write the Hamiltonian like this: | ||
| + | |||
| + | $$\begin{align*} | ||
| + | \hat H | ||
| + | &= \frac12m\omega^2V^\dagger V+\frac12\hbar\omega \\ | ||
| + | &= \frac12m\omega^2\frac{2\hbar}{m\omega}\hat a^\dagger\hat a+\frac12\hbar\omega \\ | ||
| + | &= \hbar\omega\hat a^\dagger\hat a+\frac12\hbar\omega | ||
| + | \end{align*}$$ | ||
| + | |||
| + | $$\boxed{\hat H=\hbar\omega\left(\hat a^\dagger\hat a+\frac12\right)}$$ | ||
| + | |||
| + | $$$$ | ||
| + | |||
| + | Here we can see for the first time that a **fundamental energy state** $E_0$ exists. | ||
| + | |||
| + | $$\begin{align*} | ||
| + | \left< | ||
| + | &= \left< | ||
| + | &= \left< | ||
| + | | ||
| + | \hat a^\dagger\hat a+\frac12 | ||
| + | | ||
| + | | ||
| + | &= \hbar\omega\left( | ||
| + | | ||
| + | | ||
| + | | ||
| + | &= \hbar\omega\left( | ||
| + | | ||
| + | | ||
| + | \end{align*}$$ | ||
| + | |||
| + | Requiring that the particle can take this fundamental energy gives us | ||
| + | the form of the wavefunction. In order for $\left< | ||
| + | it must be $\phi=0$ and thus $\hat a\psi_0(x)=0$. | ||
| + | |||
| + | $$\begin{align*} | ||
| + | \hat a\psi_0(x) &= 0 \\ | ||
| + | \sqrt{\frac{m\omega}{2\hbar}}\left(\hat x+\frac{i\hat p}{m\omega}\right)\psi_0(x) &= 0 \\ | ||
| + | x\psi_0(x)+\frac{i}{m\omega}\cdot(-i\hbar)\frac{d\psi_0}{dx} &= 0 \\ | ||
| + | x\psi_0(x)+\frac{\hbar}{m\omega}\frac{d\psi_0}{dx} &= 0 \\ | ||
| + | \frac{d\psi_0}{dx} &= -\frac{m\omega}{\hbar}x\psi_0(x) \\ | ||
| + | \\ | ||
| + | \psi_0(x) &= Ce^{-\large\frac{m\omega}{2\hbar}\normalsize x^2} | ||
| + | \end{align*}$$ | ||
| + | |||
| + | After proper normalization, | ||
| + | |||
| + | $$\boxed{ | ||
| + | \psi_0(x) = \left(\frac{m\omega}{\pi\hbar}\right)^{1/ | ||
| + | e^{-\large\frac{m\omega}{2\hbar}\normalsize x^2} | ||
| + | }$$ | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | $$$$ | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==== The Number Operator ==== | ||
| + | |||
| + | The operator $\hat a^\dagger\hat a$ has a unique name. It's called the **number operator** | ||
| + | and is denoted by $\hat N$. The Hamiltonian is also written | ||
| + | $\hat H=\hbar\omega\left(\hat N+1/ | ||
| + | Its function is to //label the energy level of a wavefunction//, | ||
| + | It can easily be shown that $\hat N\left|0\right> | ||
| + | and thus: | ||
| + | |||
| + | $$\require{cancel} | ||
| + | \hat H\left|0\right> | ||
| + | \cancelto{0}{\hat N\left|0\right> | ||
| + | \right) = \frac{\hbar\omega}{2}\left|0\right> | ||
| + | $$ | ||
| + | |||
| + | $$E_0=\frac{\hbar\omega}{2}$$ | ||
| + | |||
| + | It's useful to study the behaviour of the number operator. This can be done by calculating | ||
| + | its commutators. | ||
| + | |||
| + | $$ | ||
| + | \big[\hat N,\hat a\big] | ||
| + | =\big[\hat a^\dagger\hat a,\hat a\big] | ||
| + | =\hat a^\dagger\big[\hat a,\hat a\big]+\big[\hat a^\dagger, | ||
| + | =0-\big[\hat a,\hat a^\dagger\big]\hat a | ||
| + | =-\hat a | ||
| + | $$ | ||
| + | |||
| + | $$ | ||
| + | \big[\hat N,\hat a^\dagger\big] | ||
| + | =\big[\hat a^\dagger\hat a, \hat a^\dagger\big] | ||
| + | =\hat a^\dagger\big[\hat a,\hat a^\dagger\big]+\big[\hat a^\dagger, | ||
| + | =\hat a^\dagger\cdot 1+0 | ||
| + | =\hat a^\dagger | ||
| + | $$ | ||
| + | |||
| + | $$\begin{align*} | ||
| + | \big[\hat N,\hat a^k\big] | ||
| + | & | ||
| + | =0+\Big(\hat a^\dagger\hat a^k-\hat a^k\hat a^\dagger\Big)\hat a\\ | ||
| + | & | ||
| + | =\Big((\hat a\hat a^\dagger-1)\hat a^{k-1}-\hat a^k\hat a^\dagger\Big)\hat a\\ | ||
| + | & | ||
| + | =\Big(\hat a(\hat a\hat a^\dagger-1)\hat a^{k-2}-\hat a^k\hat a^\dagger-\hat a^{k-1}\Big)\hat a\\ | ||
| + | & | ||
| + | =\big(\hat a^k\hat a^\dagger-\hat a^k\hat a^\dagger-k\hat a^{k-1}\Big)\hat a\\ | ||
| + | & | ||
| + | \end{align*}$$ | ||
| + | |||
| + | $$\begin{align*} | ||
| + | \big[\hat N,(\hat a^\dagger)^k\big] | ||
| + | & | ||
| + | | ||
| + | &=\hat a^\dagger\Big((\hat a^\dagger)^k\hat a-(\hat a^\dagger)^k\hat a+k(\hat a^\dagger)^{k-1}\Big) | ||
| + | | ||
| + | &=k(\hat a^\dagger)^k | ||
| + | \end{align*}$$ | ||
| + | |||
| + | $$$$ | ||
| - | ==== The Number operator ==== | ||
| ==== Excited states ==== | ==== Excited states ==== | ||
| - | ==== How the construction | + | It was mentioned before that the creation and annihilation operators are called that because they |
| + | create or annihilate a quantum of energy $\hbar\omega$ respectively. So, when acting on an energy | ||
| + | eigenstate $\left|n\right> | ||
| + | |||
| + | Let's see how we can create excited states starting from the ground state. | ||
| + | |||
| + | $$\left|1\right> | ||
| + | |||
| + | We can find the energy level through the Number Operator. | ||
| + | |||
| + | $$ | ||
| + | \hat N\left|1\right> | ||
| + | = \hat N\hat a^\dagger\left|0\right> | ||
| + | =\left(\hat a^\dagger\hat N+\hat a^\dagger\right)\left|0\right> | ||
| + | =\hat a^\dagger\left|0\right> | ||
| + | \Leftrightarrow N=1 | ||
| + | $$ | ||
| + | $$E_1=\hbar\omega\left(N+\frac12\right)=\frac32\hbar\omega$$ | ||
| + | |||
| + | It just happens that it's already normalized. | ||
| + | |||
| + | $$\begin{align} | ||
| + | \left< | ||
| + | &= \left< | ||
| + | = \left< | ||
| + | =\left< | ||
| + | &= \big(\hat a\left|0\right> | ||
| + | \end{align}$$ | ||
| + | |||
| + | This doesn' | ||
| + | with $\left|k\right>: | ||
| + | |||
| + | $$\begin{align} | ||
| + | \left< k|k\right> | ||
| + | &= \left< | ||
| + | &= \left< | ||
| + | &= \left< | ||
| + | + \left< | ||
| + | &= 0+k\cdot\left< | ||
| + | &= k\cdot\left(\left< | ||
| + | | ||
| + | &= k\cdot\left(0+(k-1)\cdot\left< | ||
| + | &= k(k-1)\cdot\left< | ||
| + | &= \ ...\\ | ||
| + | &= k!\ \left< | ||
| + | &= k! | ||
| + | \end{align}$$ | ||
| + | |||
| + | For the normalized eigenstate $\left|n\right> | ||
| + | is $N=1/ | ||
| + | |||
| + | $$\boxed{\left|n\right> | ||
| + | |||
| + | The energy is: | ||
| + | |||
| + | $$ | ||
| + | \hat N\left|n\right> | ||
| + | = \hat N\left(\hat a^\dagger\right)^n\left|0\right> | ||
| + | = \left(\left(\hat a^\dagger\right)^n\hat N+n\left(\hat a^\dagger\right)^n\right)\left|0\right> | ||
| + | =n\left|n\right> | ||
| + | \Leftrightarrow N_n=n | ||
| + | $$ | ||
| + | |||
| + | $$\boxed{E_n=\hbar\omega\left(N_n+\frac12\right)=\left(n+\frac12\right)\hbar\omega}$$ | ||
| + | ==== Creation and Annihilation | ||
| + | |||
| + | While we can construct | ||
| + | be useful to go from one state to another one without having to pass through | ||
| + | the ground state. | ||
| + | |||
| + | If we notice that | ||
| + | $\require{cancel}\left[\hat a, | ||
| + | =\hat a\left(\hat a^\dagger\right)^n\left|0\right> | ||
| + | =\hat a\left(\hat a^\dagger\right)^n\left|0\right> | ||
| + | we can write: | ||
| + | |||
| + | $$\begin{align} | ||
| + | \hat a\left|n\right> | ||
| + | &= \frac{1}{\sqrt{n!}}\hat a\left(\hat a^\dagger\right)^n\left|0\right> | ||
| + | &= \frac{1}{\sqrt{n!}}\left[\hat a, | ||
| + | &= \frac{1}{\sqrt{n!}}n\left(\hat a^\dagger\right)^{n-1}\left|0\right> | ||
| + | &= \frac{1}{\sqrt{n!}}n\sqrt{(n-1)!}\left|n-1\right> | ||
| + | \\ | ||
| + | & | ||
| + | \end{align}$$ | ||
| + | |||
| + | Similarly, for the creation operator we have: | ||
| + | |||
| + | $$\begin{align} | ||
| + | \hat a^\dagger\left|n\right> | ||
| + | &= \frac{1}{\sqrt{n!}}\left(\hat a^\dagger\right)^{n+1}\left|0\right> | ||
| + | &= \frac{1}{\sqrt{n!}}\sqrt{(n+1)!}\left|n+1\right> | ||
| + | \\ | ||
| + | & | ||
| + | \end{align}$$ | ||
| + | ==== Position and Momentum operators ==== | ||
| + | |||
| + | The usefulness of the formulas above can be clearly seen while calculating the | ||
| + | expected values and the position and momentum dispersion. In a classical harmonic | ||
| + | oscillator the expected position should be the equilibrium point, $\left< x\right> | ||
| + | and the expected momentum should also be $\left< p\right> | ||
| + | $x$ and $p$ the oscillator is in, there is another //pair// state with $-x$ and $-p$. | ||
| + | The same happens in the quantum oscillator. | ||
| + | |||
| + | $$\begin{align} | ||
| + | \left< | ||
| + | &= \left< m\left|\hat x\right|n\right> | ||
| + | &= \sqrt{\frac{\hbar}{2m\omega}}\left< | ||
| + | &= \sqrt{\frac{\hbar}{2m\omega}}\left(\left< | ||
| + | &= \sqrt{\frac{\hbar}{2m\omega}}\left(\sqrt{n+1}\left< | ||
| + | &= \sqrt{\frac{\hbar}{2m\omega}} (0+0)=0 | ||
| + | \end{align}$$ | ||
| + | |||
| + | $$\begin{align} | ||
| + | \left< | ||
| + | &= \left< n\left|\hat p\right|n\right> | ||
| + | &= i\sqrt{\frac{\hbar m\omega}{2}}\left< | ||
| + | &= i\sqrt{\frac{\hbar m\omega}{2}}\left(\left< | ||
| + | &= i\sqrt{\frac{\hbar m\omega}{2}}\left(\sqrt{n+1}\left< | ||
| + | &= i\sqrt{\frac{\hbar m\omega}{2}}(0+0)=0 | ||
| + | \end{align}$$ | ||
| + | |||
| + | Unlike the expected position and momentum, we cannot //guess// their dispersion. Here we | ||
| + | actually need the creation and annihilation operators in order to avoid difficult integrals. | ||
| + | |||
| + | $$\require{cancel}\begin{align} | ||
| + | \Delta x_n^2 | ||
| + | &= \left< | ||
| + | &= \left< n\left|\hat x\hat x\right|n\right> | ||
| + | &= \frac{\hbar}{2m\omega}\left< | ||
| + | &= \frac{\hbar}{2m\omega}\left< | ||
| + | \end{align}$$ | ||
| + | |||
| + | The operator $\hat a^\dagger\hat a^\dagger$ will give us the state $\left|n+2\right> | ||
| + | and it has no contribution to the sum. Similarly, we can ignore the $\hat a\hat a$ term. The operator $\hat a^\dagger\hat a$ is | ||
| + | just the number operator $\hat N$ with eigenvalue $n$. The operator $\hat a\hat a^\dagger$ can be written a different way | ||
| + | with the help of the commutator, $\hat a\hat a^\dagger=\left[\hat a,\hat a^\dagger\right]+\hat a^\dagger\hat a=1+\hat N$, and | ||
| + | then also replaced by the eigenvalue $1+n$. | ||
| + | |||
| + | $$\begin{align} | ||
| + | \Delta x_n^2 | ||
| + | &= \frac{\hbar}{2m\omega}\left< | ||
| + | &= \frac{\hbar}{2m\omega}\left(2n+1\right)\left< | ||
| + | &= \frac{\hbar}{2m\omega}\left(n+\frac12\right) | ||
| + | \end{align}$$ | ||
| + | |||
| + | When calculating $\Delta p_n^2$ we can use the same // | ||
| + | |||
| + | $$\require{cancel}\begin{align} | ||
| + | \Delta p_n^2 | ||
| + | &= \left< | ||
| + | &= \left< n\left|\hat p\hat p\right|n\right> | ||
| + | &= i^2\frac{\hbar m\omega}{2}\left< | ||
| + | &= \frac{\hbar m\omega}{2}\left< | ||
| + | &= \frac{\hbar m\omega}{2}\left< | ||
| + | &= \frac{\hbar m\omega}{2}\left< | ||
| + | &= \frac{\hbar m\omega}{2}\left(2n+1\right)\left< | ||
| + | &= \hbar m\omega\left(n+\frac12\right) | ||
| + | \end{align}$$ | ||
| - | ==== position and momentum operators ==== | + | We find the least dispersion at $n=0$. We then have: |
| + | $$\Delta x\Delta p=\sqrt{\frac12\frac{\hbar}{m\omega}}\cdot\sqrt{\frac12\hbar m\omega}=\frac{\hbar}{2}$$ | ||
| + | This result very much reminds us of [[uncertainty-principle|Heisenberg' | ||